KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    SIL Verification of Safety Instrumented System for Block Valve System in Gas Pipeline by Using Markov Model Methodology
    (2017-01-01)
    Kongtong, P.
    ;
    Chitwong, S.
    This paper presents about methods for evaluation of safety integrity level (SIL) which is significant to reduce risk of failure of block valve in gas pipeline system by using Markov Model method which refer to International standard IEC 61508/61511. The reason of using Markov Model method is that it takes less time and more flexible than other methods to determine SIL. This method uses a qualitative approach showing Average Probability of Failure (PFDavg) rate data and repairing time from model to implement in further process.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Evaluating diversity and redundancy-based search metrics independently
    (2014-11-26)
    Tangsomboon, Ake
    ;
    Leelanupab, Teerapong
    This paper proposes a new evaluation metric, normalized Coverage Frequency (nCF), which aims to explicitly evaluate the diversity of search results, going beyond the drawbacks of previously proposed measures. In fact, two of the most widely adopted metrics for the diversity retrieval task, namely-nDCG and Intent-Aware Expected Reciprocal Rank (ERR-IA), explicitly evaluate redundancy, but not diversity. While there exists a genuine diversity-based metric called Intent Recall (I-rec), it has some drawbacks. These drawbacks may be inherited by other derived metrics such as D#-nDCG, which combines I-rec with a modified version of nDCG. The proposed nCF metric assesses how often query-intents are successfully covered throughout a ranked list up to a given rank position. A comprehensive study is conducted using both real and synthetic data to compare nCF with-nDCG, ERR-IA, I-recall and D#-nDCG. Results show that the proposed metric correlates well with the existing ones while it is capable of capturing other factors, e.g., a series of coverage. In addition, we categorize the existing metrics into two distinct groups, i.e., diversity and novelty, based upon their intuitive measurements and suggest that they be used independently according to what they quantify for the ease of performance interpretation.