KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Access type: UnknownSubject: search.filters.subject.Sentiment classification

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Cross domain sentiment classification of Thai reviews using co-train model
    (2019-01-01)
    Boonpetch, Warakorn
    ;
    Chitsobhuk, Orachat
    Online reviews are significant sources of information, which is useful for supporting customer and entrepreneur decision in terms of product and service satisfaction analysis. Online reviews containing feedback from various domains makes it difficult to analyze and classify all comments at once. The proposed technique analyses the cross-domain Thai review data using a co-train machine learning model. The co-train model consists of multiple single domain specific models followed by refinement analysis for the final sentiment classification. This allows for full flexibility in training of each individual domain, which can lessen the limitation on training complexity due to simple training on single domain. The experiments have been conducted on Wongnai restaurant domain and IMDB movie domain data. Our co-train model can achieve the highest average accuracy of 86.10 percent for cross-domain sentiment classification with approximately 38 seconds processing time.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Thai stock news sentiment classification using wordpair features
    (2015-01-01)
    Chattupan, Apinan
    ;
    Netisopakul, Ponrudee
    Thai stock brokers issue daily stock news for their customers. One broker labels these news with plus, minus and zero sign to indicate the type of recommendation. This paper proposed to classify Thai stock news by extracting important texts from the news. The extracted text is in a form of a 'wordpair'. Three wordpair sets, manual wordpairs extraction (ME), manual wordpairs addition (MA), and automate wordpairs combination (AC), are constructed and compared for their precision, recall and f-measure. Using this broker's news as a training set and unseen stock news from other brokers as a testing set, the experiment shows that all three sets have similar results for the training set but the second and the third set have better classification results in classifying stock news from unseen brokers.