KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
2 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The Moderating Effects of Board Independence and the Separation of Chairman–Chief Executive Officer Duality Roles on a Firm’s Value: Evidence from the Thai Listed Firms(2026-06-01) ;Buachoom, Wonlop WritthymAmornkitvikai, YotSince the 1997 financial crisis, good corporate governance is one of the most contentious problems for Thai listed companies’ long-term viability. Unlike earlier research in Thailand, this article uses a three-level hierarchical regression model to examine the moderating effects of board independence and the separation of chairman–chief executive officer (CEO) duality roles on the firm’s value of the Thai listed firms between 2010 and 2019. This study confirms a negative relationship between family ownership and a firm’s value in Thailand. Nevertheless, it reveals that the association between family ownership and firm’s value becomes positive if the Thai listed firms have a high proportion of independent directors. Further evidence confirms that the separation of chairman–CEO duality roles can increase a firm’s value, but it cannot solely enhance the value in those firms with high family ownership. Finally, this study discusses empirically-based practical implications and recommendations. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Female ownership and female directors’ moderating role as corporate governance monitoring mechanisms in increasing the value of Thai family-owned firms(2023-11-16) ;Buachoom, Wonlop Writthym ;Amornkitvikai, Yot ;Al Farooque, OmarSun, LanPurpose: The phenomenon of “broken rungs” has prevented most women from attaining managerial positions relative to men. Despite this gender disparity in management, female executives are more likely to enhance shareholder trust due to higher ethical standards, which can be hypothesized to mitigate the negative impact of family ownership on firm value. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the moderating role of female ownership and female directors in mitigating the unfavorable effects of family ownership on firm value as measured by Tobin’s Q and the Market Value of Equity (MVE). Design/methodology/approach: Multiple linear regression is applied to examine the proposed hypotheses, as well as other vital factors, such as board independence (BI), the dual chief executive officer (CEO)–chairman role (CEO duality) and control variables (i.e. firm size, firm age, leverage and investment ratio). Findings: The results revealed that female directors could buffer the negative impact caused by family ownership, leading to higher firm value, when given a sufficient level of female ownership or the appointment of more female directors, regardless of female ownership levels. Otherwise, female ownership cannot help overcome the negative effects of family ownership in Thai-listed firms. This study also sheds light on corporate governance elements that impact firm value. CEO duality reduces the value of Thai-listed companies, whereas board independence increases firm value. Practical implications: The managerial roles for women should be promoted in Thai-listed enterprises. The government can support new laws, policies and programs for embracing a cross-cutting gender perspective. Female network initiatives enable women to advance in their managerial careers. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study intends to fill the research gap by investigating how female directors and owners can moderate family ownership’s influence on the value of firms listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), which is one of the emerging capital markets.
