KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Hiransuthikul, AkarinSubject: search.filters.subject.Thailand

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    CGRP-targeted therapy fulfilling the treatment gap in medication-underuse setting: a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary headache center in Thailand, a lower-middle-income country
    (2025-12-01)
    Roongrojwittayakul, Sirawit
    ;
    Anukoolwittaya, Prakit
    ;
    Hiransuthikul, Akarin
    ;
    Pongpitakmetha, Thanakit
    ;
    Thanprasertsuk, Sekh
    Background: Migraine preventive treatment is essential to reducing the burden of disease. However, discontinuation of oral migraine preventive medications (OMPMs) remains common due to suboptimal efficacy and tolerability, especially in lower-middle-income countries, which may contribute to migraine progression—a situation that has led to the introduction of the concept of “Medication Underuse Headache”. The calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody (CGRP mAbs) might close the gap in this situation. This study aimed to investigate the treatment patterns of migraine preventive medications over six months at a tertiary headache center in Thailand and to explore the association between each preventive medication class and discontinuation rates. Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2021 and 2023. Adult patients who were diagnosed with migraine and received at least one preventive medication at their first visit to the Headache Clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital were included, with a minimum follow-up period of six months. The primary outcome was the discontinuation of any migraine preventive medication from the baseline regimen during follow-up visits. A multivariable Cox regression model, adjusted for sex, age, and diagnosis, was used to explore baseline factors associated with the discontinuation of preventive migraine medications. Results: Among the 100 eligible patients (mean age [SD]: 39.6 [14.4] years; 87.0% female), 41.0% (41/100) discontinued at least one preventive medication, most commonly due to intolerance to side effects (53.7%, 22/41) and lack of treatment effectiveness (34.1%, 14/41). The highest discontinuation rates were observed with serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors at 53.8% (7/13), calcium channel blockers at 37.5% (6/16), and beta-blockers at 25.6% (11/43). Notably, no patients discontinued CGRP mAbs. Patients using CGRP mAbs at baseline had a significantly higher rate of discontinuing at least one other oral preventive medication compared to those who did not use CGRP mAbs: 31.7% vs. 25.4% at month 3, and 55.4% vs. 33.4% at month 6 (p = 0.04). After adjustment, baseline use of CGRP mAbs was significantly associated with an increased risk of discontinuing at least one medication in the regimen (adjusted odds ratio 2.16; 95% CI: 1.16 to 4.03, p = 0.02). Conclusion: Discontinuation of preventive migraine treatment remains a significant issue in Thailand. CGRP mAbs were associated with higher treatment persistence and may help reduce polypharmacy in migraine management.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Filling the data gap on CGRP mAb therapy in low- to middle-income countries in Southeast Asia: insights from a real-world study in Thailand
    (2024-12-01)
    Anukoolwittaya, Prakit
    ;
    Hiransuthikul, Akarin
    ;
    Pongpitakmetha, Thanakit
    ;
    Thanprasertsuk, Sekh
    ;
    Rattanawong, Wanakorn
    Background: Most real-world data on CGRP mAbs have been published from high-income countries such as the USA, Western countries, Japan, Korea, and Singapore. However, data from low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia is lacking. This is the first real-world study from Thailand to describe the efficacy of CGRP mAbs therapy in migraine patients and to analyze the response trends between episodic migraine and chronic migraine. Methods: We conducted a single-center, real-world retrospective chart review study with an observation period of 6 months after CGRP mAbs initiation. We aim to compare treatment responses to CGRP mAbs between EM and CM patients. Results: A total of 47 Thai patients were enrolled (median [IQR] age 37.2 [28.6–50.4] years; 85.1%F, 44.7% EM; 70.2% galcanezumab). There was no difference in baseline characteristics and migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) between EM and CM. The overall ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% monthly migraine day reduction rates at 6 months were 89.0%, 71.6%, and 58.5% with higher responders in EM. There was a significant decrease in monthly headache days (MHDs) over time (adjusted β = -0.42, p < 0.001) and a significant decrease in MIDAS score over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs (adjusted β = -1.12, p = 0.003). However, there were no differences between the two diagnoses. There was no significant decrease in the number of abortive medication pills used over time after the initiation of CGRP mAbs. CM had a significantly steeper trend compared to those with EM. Conclusion: The first real-world study in Thailand demonstrated that CGRP mAbs therapy had efficacy for migraine treatment, as evidenced by a reduction in MHDs, decreased disability, and reduced use of abortive medications. Additionally, the response pattern to CGRP mAbs therapy was similar between EM and CM in terms of MHDs reduction and MIDAS score improvement.