KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Simultaneous equatorial plasma bubble observation using amplitude scintillations from GNSS and LEO satellites in low-latitude region(2023-12-01) ;Seechai, Khanitin ;Myint, Lin Min Min ;Hozumi, Kornyanat ;Nishioka, MichiSaito, SusumuThis study estimates the scale sizes of the plasma density irregularities and the longitudinal width associated with equatorial plasma bubbles (EPBs) in equatorial and low-latitude regions. By analyzing amplitude scintillation S<inf>4</inf> indices and total electron content (TEC) measured from low earth orbit (LEO) satellite’s beacon signals with 400 MHz and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) L1/E1 signals with 1575.42 MHz, recorded by receivers at the KMITL station in Bangkok, Thailand (geographic; 13.73° N, 100.77°E, magnetic: 7.26°N), we investigate the characteristics of these irregularities. We collected data of 154 LEO satellite pass events during nighttime on 21 disturbed days in four equinoctial months in 2021. Based on the presence or absence of the scintillation effects on GNSS and LEO beacon signals, the events are categorized into four classes to estimate the scale size of the plasma density irregularities. The analysis suggests that events with both GNSS and LEO scintillations, as well as events with GNSS scintillation alone, occur predominantly before midnight assuming the presence of the small-scale size of the irregularities within EPB. However, events with only LEO scintillation occur throughout the whole night and some events are observed before the events with both GNSS and LEO scintillations. Post-sunset LEO scintillation alone may be attributed to the onset of EPBs developing at low altitude, while post-midnight LEO scintillation events near the magnetic equator, observed during periods of low GNSS Rate of TEC Index (ROTI) values, are associated with bottom-side ionospheric irregularities but are not linked with EPB. The findings are consistent with previous researches on the generation and decay of electron density irregularities within plasma bubbles. However, this study provides new insights by using specific data sets and analysis techniques, offering a more comprehensive understanding of the association of LEO scintillations with bottom-side ionospheric irregularities near the magnetic equator, not observed in the ROTI map. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Classification of the equatorial plasma bubbles using convolutional neural network and support vector machine techniques(2023-12-01) ;Thanakulketsarat, Thananphat ;Supnithi, Pornchai ;Myint, Lin Min Min ;Hozumi, KornyanatNishioka, MichiEquatorial plasma bubble (EPB) is a phenomenon characterized by depletions in ionospheric plasma density being formed during post-sunset hours. The ionospheric irregularities can lead to disruptions in trans-ionospheric radio systems, navigation systems and satellite communications. Real-time detection and classification of EPBs are crucial for the space weather community. Since 2020, the Prachomklao radar station, a very high frequency (VHF) radar station, has been installed at Chumphon station (Geographic: 10.72° N, 99.73° E and Geomagnetic: 1.33° N) and started to produce radar images ever since. In this work, we propose two real-time plasma bubble detection systems based on support vector machine techniques. Two designs are made with the convolutional neural network (CNN) and singular value decomposition (SVD) used for feature extraction, the connected to the support vector machine (SVM) for EPB classification. The proposed models are trained using quick look (QL) plot images from the VHF radar system at the Chumphon station, Thailand, in 2017. The experimental results show that the combined CNN-SVM model, using the RBF kernel, achieves the highest accuracy of 93.08% while the model using the polynomial kernel achieved an accuracy of 92.14%. On the other hand, the combined SVD-SVM models yield the accuracies of 88.37% and 85.00% for RBF and polynomial kernels of SVM, respectively. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].
