KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Ionospheric disturbances as precursor signals of the March 28, 2025, Myanmar earthquake
    (2026-03-15)
    Pansong, C.
    ;
    Ruttanaburee, S.
    ;
    Pornsopin, P.
    ;
    Kenpankho, P.
    This study examined the ionospheric response associated with the Mw 7.7 Myanmar earthquake on March 28, 2025, using GPS-derived Total Electron Content (TEC) data from seven GNSS stations across Thailand. TEC variations were analyzed alongside Dst and Kp indices, as well as ionosonde-derived parameters, namely the critical frequency of the F2 layer (foF2), the peak height of the F2 layer (hmF2), the disturbances in NmF2, and the slab thickness (τ), which were obtained from three IGS-supported stations. We detected abnormal variations in TEC approximately 15 days before the earthquake (13–27 March 2025), characterized by alternating positive and negative deviations. The TEC exhibited alternating positive and negative deviations throughout the analysis period, reflecting ionospheric variability prior to the earthquake. During the early period (13–18 March), the deviations remained within approximately ±6 TECU. However, from 19 to 21 and 23–24 March, moderate fluctuations were observed, particularly at mid- and low-latitude stations (UTHG, THBK, THCP, and THPK), where ΔTEC ranged from ±6 to 10 TECU. The TEC decrease occurred on 25 March under weak geomagnetic conditions (Dst >  −30 nT) at the northern stations MAEH (−18.40 TECU), THCM (−15.65 TECU), and NANN (−15.73 TECU), marking the most pronounced negative anomaly observed during the study period. Subsequently, on 26–27 March, TEC values recovered to positive anomalies of +4 to +10 TECU, indicating a return to normal ionospheric conditions. To objectively identify pre-seismic ionospheric anomalies, a Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) approach was applied using a ±1.34MAD threshold. This statistical technique effectively detects subtle deviations while minimizing transient noise. The results reveal coherent TEC depletions across multiple stations on 25 March, suggesting the presence of localized ionospheric disturbances potentially related to seismo-ionospheric processes rather than geomagnetic effects. Furthermore, concurrent anomalous increases in foF2 and hmF2, along with a reduction in slab thickness near the epicentral region, indicate vertical uplift of the F2 layer, consistent with possible Lithosphere–Atmosphere–Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) mechanisms.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Low latitude TEC disturbances during extreme geomagnetic storms: insights into March and May 2024
    (2025-12-15)
    Pansong, C.
    ;
    Wongsak, P.
    ;
    Ruttanaburee, S.
    ;
    Pornsopin, P.
    ;
    Kenpankho, P.
    This study investigates the variations of the Total Electron Content (TEC) in response to the extreme geomagnetic storms at the low latitudes over Thailand in 2024. For analyzing data from geomagnetic storms recorded in March and May 2024, with Dst maximum to −412 nT and Kp index to 9 on May 11, 2024, Dst at −351 nT and Kp at 9- on May 10, 2024, Dst at −159 nT and Kp at 7 on May 12, 2024, and Dst at −128 nT and Kp at 8 + on March 24, 2024. This study conducted a 13-day analysis for maximum negative Dst storm event, encompassing six days before and six days after the event. Data were sourced from GNSS receiver stations at Chiang Mai (THCM: 19.21°N, 99.12°E, 9.96°N Dip), Bangkok (THBK: 13.73°N, 100.78°E, 4.82°N Dip), and Chumphon (THCP: 10.72°N, 99.38°E, 1.85°N Dip), Thailand. The study highlights a significant TEC disturbance that increases during the extreme geomagnetic storm, particularly at THCP, next to equatorial latitude. TEC increases at a heightened sensitivity to geomagnetic storms. As a result, TEC reached up to 60 TECU from the average TEC of the six previous days and six posterior days excluding the maximum storm event day at a low latitude. The intense nighttime geomagnetic storms were a few events that resulted in minimal TEC gap increases compared to the daytime geomagnetic storms. Additionally, the correlation coefficient between geomagnetic storm levels and TEC disturbances is strongly and significantly linked to storm intensity. The signature of TEC disturbance is influenced during extreme geomagnetic storms in the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 25 at low latitudes, emphasizing the importance of enhanced understanding of TEC behavior in low latitude regions.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Comparison of observed TEC values with IRI-2007 TEC and IRI-2007 TEC with optional foF2 measurements predictions at an equatorial region, Chumphon, Thailand
    (2013-11-15)
    Kenpankho, P.
    ;
    Supnithi, P.
    ;
    Nagatsuma, T.
    In this research, as part of working towards improving the IRI over equatorial region, the total electron content (TEC) derived from GPS measurements and IRI-2007 TEC predictions at Chumphon station (10.72 N, 99.37 E), Thailand, during 2004-2006 is analyzed. The seasonal variation of the IRI-2007 TEC predictions is compared with the TEC from the IRI-2007 TEC model with the option of the actual F2 plasma frequency (foF2) measurements as well as the TEC from the GPS and International GNSS service (IGS). The Chumphon station is located at the equatorial region and the low latitude of 3.22 N. For a declining phase of the solar cycle (2004-2006), the study shows that the IRI-2007 TEC underestimates the IRI-2007 TEC with the foF2 observation at the nighttime by about 5 TECU. The maximum differences are about 15 TECU during daytime and 5 TECU during nighttime. The overestimation is more evident at daytime than at nighttime. When compared in terms of the root-mean square error (RMSE), we find that the highest RMSE between GPS TEC and IRI 2007 TEC is 14.840 TECU at 1230 LT in 2004 and the lowest average between them is 1.318 TECU at 0630 LT in 2006. The noon bite-out phenomena are clearly seen in the IRI-2007 TEC with and without optional foF2 measurements, but not on the GPS TEC and IGS TEC. The IRI TEC with optional foF2 measurements gives the lowest RMSE values between IRI TEC predicted and TEC measurement. However, the TEC measurements (GPS TEC and IGS TEC) are more correct to use at Chumphon station. © 2012 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Variation of ionospheric slab thickness observations at Chumphon equatorial magnetic location
    (2011-01-01)
    Kenpankho, P.
    ;
    Supnithi, P.
    ;
    Tsugawa, T.
    ;
    Maruyama, T.
    This study presents the diurnal and seasonal variations of slab thickness at the equatorial magnetic latitudes in Thailand during 2004-2006, corresponding to the declining part of low solar activity. The GPS-derived total electron content (TEC) and the maximum electron density of the F-region (N <inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf>) are used to compute the slab thickness (&tau) at the Chumphon station (10.72<sup>°</sup>N, 99.37<sup>°</sup>E), located near the magnetic equator. The results show that large peaks of slab thickness exist during the pre-sunrise hours in all three seasons at Chumphon when compared with other latitudes. The maximum value of slab thickness occurs when the peak electron density in the F<inf>2</inf> region is at the lowest level. During daytime, the slab thickness ranges from 200 kilometers to 580 kilometers for all seasons. During nighttime, the maximum value of slab thickness is 1250 kilometers in the summer of 2004. Moreover, the diurnal variation shows two minima that appear around 0900 LT and 1900 LT, during the post-sunrise and sunset hours. The seasonal variations show that the average slab thickness daily value is greater during summer and winter than those during equinox. Our study finds that the slab thickness at Chumphon located near the equatorial latitude is much larger than those found at low, mid, and high latitudes. The difference in slab thickness between the equatorial latitude and other zones is explained by the lack of plasma flow from the plasmasphere to the F<inf>2</inf> region at the magnetic equator. Copyright © The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth.