KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
5 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Low-Latitude Ionospheric Responses to Two Matched Intense Equinoctial Geomagnetic Storms: A Case-Based Comparison Between Solar Cycles 24 and 25(2026-01-16) ;Pansong, CholladaKenpankho, PrasertThis study investigates the ionospheric responses to two matched intense equinoctial geomagnetic storms that occurred during Solar Cycles 24 and 25 (SCs 24 and 25), with emphasis on variations in Total Electron Content (TEC), the F2-layer critical frequency (foF2), and the F2-layer peak height (hmF2). TEC data were derived from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) based on Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations, while foF2 and hmF2 parameters were obtained from the Global Assimilative Model of the Bottomside Ionosphere Timeline (GAMBIT) for 22 low-latitude locations worldwide. The results show that the SC25 storm produced stronger and more spatially extensive ionospheric responses than the SC24 event. Peak TEC values during SC25 exceeded those of SC24 by up to ~80-90 TECU in the Southeast Asian, East Asian, and Pacific sectors near the storm main phase, indicating a pronounced positive ionospheric storm. These enhancements are closely associated with higher solar wind speeds (~650-700 km s<sup>–1</sup>) and strongly fluctuating IMF Bz during SC25, which generated sustained multi-pulse Prompt Penetration Electric Fields (PPEFs) that intensified E × B plasma drifts and the equatorial fountain effect. In contrast, SC24 was characterized by lower solar wind speeds (~550-600 km s<sup>–1</sup>) and a predominantly southward IMF Bz, resulting in shorter-lived PPEF activity, weaker TEC enhancements, and pronounced depletion during the recovery phase. Correlation analysis between Dst and TEC disturbances reveals strong negative correlations (r ≈ −0.6 to −0.9) in the Asia-Pacific sectors during the main phase, indicating that enhanced TEC disturbances tend to coincide with periods of increasing storm intensity, whereas predominantly positive correlations (r ≈ 0.6-0.9) are observed in the Middle Eastern-African-European sector, reflecting TEC depletion. The foF2 response shows clear phase dependence, with localized daytime enhancements during the main phase but widespread reductions of ~15-20% during recovery in both solar cycles, consistent with the influence of Disturbance Dynamo Electric Fields (DDEFs), and thermospheric composition changes. In contrast, hmF2 exhibits solar-cycle-dependent behavior, with modest increases (~3-8%) during SC24 and more variable, often negative responses (up to ~2-3% decrease) during SC25. These findings highlight the heterogeneous, region-dependent, and solar cycle-dependent nature of ionospheric variability during intense geomagnetic storms, with important implications for space weather modeling and prediction. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, GNSS Receiver Bias Model for Near Real Time TEC Monitoring at Low Latitude, Thailand(2026-01-01) ;Kenpankho, Prasert ;Maichuen, Samatchaya ;Phothila, Prarinya ;Zhang, JianfengKeokhumcheng, ThanaponThis research proposes and investigates GNSS receiver bias modeling for near real time total electron content (TEC) monitoring across 16 multi-frequency GNSS stations in low latitude, Thailand, from 2022-2024. By applying a refined methodology based on Kenpankho et al. (2021) and integrating IONOLAB-BIAS for single station bias estimation, the research corrects for satellite and receiver inter-frequency biases to enhance TEC accuracy. Results show a consistent upward trend in TEC values, reflecting increased latitudes, seasonal ionospheric activity, and geomagnetic storms. Comparative analysis with the IRI 2020 model using correlation coefficients and RMSE reveals spatial and temporal variation, with near equatorial latitude stations showing strong alignment than upper low latitude stations. The results highlight the importance of localized GNSS-based TEC models for improving satellite positioning accuracy in equatorial regions and highlight the limitations of global models under dynamic ionospheric conditions. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The study on the relationship between ionospheric delay and low-cost localizing robots(2025-03-01) ;Sumniang, Patiphan ;Sittichai, WishapolKenpankho, PrasertThe dispersive and anisotropic nature of the ionosphere above certain regions particularly on Thailand's low − nearly equatorial − latitude, positioning accuracy is seriously affected when using a precision limited model. Change in ionospheric delay is a key factor impacting the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) positioning and navigation accuracy. We studied the effect of ionospheric delay on localizing low-cost robots. We investigated the positioning error using ionospheric delay from a GNSS receiver, IRI and our campus, KMITL, in Bangkok, to guide our ‘G-LOC’ robot. There were eight target points, set from 3 to 50 m at the same meridian with varying latitudes. Impacts on a robot moving on low solar activity days, high solar activity days, daytime, and nighttime were measured over 12 months in 2023. We found that high solar activity day impacts a robot moving on highest accuracy error up to 363 cm at high speed. In addition, we found that daytime impacts a robot moving on highest accuracy error up to 154.05 cm at high speed as well. Ionospheric delay according to high and low solar activities, and daytime, and nighttime effects on the GNSS interference transmitted to a low-cost localizing robot was expected to affect moving errors, but it did not seem to lead to a significant difference in error between the low and high solar activity days. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Real-time GPS receiver bias estimation(2021-09-01) ;Kenpankho, Prasert ;Chaichana, Amornchai ;Trachu, Koson ;Supnithi, PornchaiHozumi, KornyanatIn this paper, we present the new method for real-time GPS receiver bias estimation by using Lagrange interpolation, which is also compared to the two current methods, polynomial and minimization of standard deviation. The estimated method is proposed to reduce the complexity and time of the GPS receiver bias estimation. Lagrange interpolation is the method to find the derivatives and integrals of discrete functions in GPS receiver bias data. The test site is located on Chumphon station, Thailand. The test period of data method is during the year 2004–2019. In the quiet and disturbed days, the polynomial method gives the highest value of the GPS receiver bias at −5.75 ns and −4.25 ns, respectively, but the Lagrange interpolation shows the lowest value of GPS receiver bias at −6.85 ns and −5.25 ns, in order. The results and comparisons among the polynomial GPS receiver bias method, the minimization of standard deviation of GPS receiver bias method, and Lagrange interpolation method show that the calculated time for Lagrange interpolation is shorter compared to other methods and it can be given more time points for finding GPS receiver biases than others. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Estimation of the single GPS-receiver bias using the gradient descent algorithm(2016-09-06) ;Chiablaem, Athiwat ;Supnithi, Pornchai ;Klinngam, Somjai ;Panachart, ChaiwatSaekow, ApithepThe ionospheric Total Electron Content (TEC) can be obtained from processing measurements of the dual-frequency Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver. The main sources of errors in the TEC calculation are satellite and receiver biases. In this paper, we apply the gradient descent algorithm on the receiver bias estimation. The TEC is derived from measurements at 12 dual-frequency GPS stations in Thailand. The criterion of receiver bias estimation is based on the minimum sum of the vertical TEC (VTEC) standard deviation method. The results show that the maximum receiver bias value is approximately 3.69 ns at UDON station, while the minimum value is -5.91 ns at SRTN station. The accuracy of the receiver biases from this algorithm is compared with the reference method. The maximum percentage deviation is about 7.5% at SRTN station. The percentage deviation of the minimum sum of the VTEC between the reference method and the proposed method from all stations are less than 0.05%. Thus, the proposed algorithm is a viable option to estimate the receiver bias.
