KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
5 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Comparison of Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Soil Erosion Pin Measurements(2021-01-01) ;Nguyen, Kieu Anh ;Chen, Walter ;Lin, Bor ShiunSeeboonruang, UmaAlthough machine learning has been extensively used in various fields, it has only recently been applied to soil erosion pin modeling. To improve upon previous methods of quantifying soil erosion based on erosion pin measurements, this study explored the possible application of ensemble machine learning algorithms to the Shihmen Reservoir watershed in northern Taiwan. Three categories of ensemble methods were considered in this study: (a) Bagging, (b) boosting, and (c) stacking. The bagging method in this study refers to bagged multivariate adaptive regression splines (bagged MARS) and random forest (RF), and the boosting method includes Cubist and gradient boosting machine (GBM). Finally, the stacking method is an ensemble method that uses a meta-model to combine the predictions of base models. This study used RF and GBM as the meta-models, decision tree, linear regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine as the base models. The dataset used in this study was sampled using stratified random sampling to achieve a 70/30 split for the training and test data, and the process was repeated three times. The performance of six ensemble methods in three categories was analyzed based on the average of three attempts. It was found that GBM performed the best among the ensemble models with the lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE = 1.72 mm/year), the highest Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE = 0.54), and the highest index of agreement (d = 0.81). This result was confirmed by the spatial comparison of the absolute differences (errors) between model predictions and observations using GBM and RF in the study area. In summary, the results show that as a group, the bagging method and the boosting method performed equally well, and the stacking method was third for the erosion pin dataset considered in this study. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Evaluation of the SEdiment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) model in the Shihmen Reservoir watershed(2020-08-01) ;Thomas, Kent ;Chen, Walter ;Lin, Bor ShiunSeeboonruang, UmaThe sediment delivery ratio (SDR) connects the weight of sediments eroded and trans-ported from slopes of a watershed to the weight that eventually enters streams and rivers ending at the watershed outlet. For watershed management agencies, the estimation of annual sediment yield (SY) and the sediment delivery has been a top priority due to the influence that sedimentation has on the holding capacity of reservoirs and the annual economic cost of sediment-related disasters. This study establishes the SEdiment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) model for the Shihmen Reservoir watershed using watershed-wide SDRw and determines the geospatial distribution of individual SDRi and SY in its sub-watersheds. Furthermore, this research considers the statistical and geospa-tial distribution of SDRi across the two discretizations of sub-watersheds in the study area. It shows the probability density function (PDF) of the SDRi. The watershed-specific coefficient (β) of SDRi is 0.00515 for the Shihmen Reservoir watershed using the recursive method. The SY mean of the entire watershed was determined to be 42.08 t/ha/year. Moreover, maps of the mean SY by 25 and 93 sub-watersheds were proposed for watershed prioritization for future research and remedial works. The outcomes of this study can ameliorate future watershed remediation planning and sediment control by the implementation of geospatial SDRw/SDRi and the inclusion of the sub-watershed prioritiza-tion in decision-making. Finally, it is essential to note that the sediment yield modeling can be im-proved by increased on-site validation and the use of aerial photogrammetry to deliver more up-dated data to better understand the field situations. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Using machine learning-based algorithms to analyze erosion rates of a watershed in Northern Taiwan(2020-03-01) ;Nguyen, Kieu Anh ;Chen, Walter ;Lin, Bor ShiunSeeboonruang, UmaThis study continues a previous study with further analysis of watershed-scale erosion pin measurements. Three machine learning (ML) algorithms-Support Vector Machine (SVM), Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-were used to analyze depth of erosion of a watershed (Shihmen reservoir) in northern Taiwan. In addition to three previously used statistical indexes (Mean Absolute Error, Root Mean Square of Error, and R-squared), Nash-Sutcliffe Effciency (NSE) was calculated to compare the predictive performances of the three models. To see if there was a statistical difference between the three models, theWilcoxon signed-rank test was used. The research utilized 14 environmental attributes as the input predictors of the ML algorithms. They are distance to river, distance to road, type of slope, sub-watershed, slope direction, elevation, slope class, rainfall, epoch, lithology, and the amount of organic content, clay, sand, and silt in the soil. Additionally, measurements of a total of 550 erosion pins installed on 55 slopes were used as the target variable of the model prediction. The dataset was divided into a training set (70%) and a testing set (30%) using the stratified random sampling with sub-watershed as the stratification variable. The results showed that the ANFIS model outperforms the other two algorithms in predicting the erosion rates of the study area. The average RMSE of the test data is 2.05 mm/yr for ANFIS, compared to 2.36 mm/yr and 2.61 mm/yr for ANN and SVM, respectively. Finally, the results of this study (ANN, ANFIS, and SVM) were compared with the previous study (Random Forest, Decision Tree, and multiple regression). It was found that Random Forest remains the best predictive model, and ANFIS is the second-best among the six ML algorithms. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Predicting sheet and rill erosion of Shihmen reservoir watershed in Taiwan using machine learning(2019-07-01) ;Nguyen, Kieu Anh ;Chen, Walter ;Lin, Bor Shiun ;Seeboonruang, UmaThomas, KentShihmen Reservoir watershed is vital to the water supply in Northern Taiwan but the reservoir has been heavily impacted by sedimentation and soil erosion since 1964. The purpose of this study was to explore the capability of machine learning algorithms, such as decision tree and random forest, to predict soil erosion (sheet and rill erosion) depths in the Shihmen reservoir watershed. The accuracy of the models was evaluated using the RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error), MAE (Mean Absolute Error), and R<sup>2</sup>. Moreover, the models were verified against the multiple regression analysis, which is commonly used in statistical analysis. The predictors of these models were 14 environmental factors which influence soil erosion, whereas the target was 550 erosion pins installed at 55 locations (on 55 slopes) and monitored over a period of approximately three years. The data sets for the models were separated into 70% for the training data and 30% for the testing data, using the simple random sampling and stratified random sampling methods. The results show that the random forest algorithm performed the best of the three methods. Moreover, the stratified random sampling method had better results among the two sampling methods, as anticipated. The average error (RMSE relative to 1:1 line) of the stratified random sampling method of the random forest algorithm is 0.93 mm/yr in the training data and 1.75 mm/yr in the testing data, respectively. Finally, the random forest algorithm predicted that type of slope, slope direction, and sub-watershed are the three most important factors of the 14 environmental factors collected and used in this study for splits in the trees and thus they are the three most important factors affecting the depth of sheet and rill erosion in the Shihmen Reservoir watershed. The results of this study can be employed by decision-makers to improve soil conservation planning and watershed remediation. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Soil erosion modeling and comparison using slope units and grid cells in Shihmen reservoir watershed in Northern Taiwan(2018-10-03) ;Liu, Yi Hsin ;Li, Dong Huang ;Chen, Walter ;Lin, Bor ShiunSeeboonruang, UmaSoil erosion is a global problem that will become worse as a result of climate change. While many parts of the world are speculating about the effect of increased rainfall intensity and frequency on soil erosion, Taiwan's mountainous areas are already facing the power of rainfall erosivity more than six times the global average. To improve the modeling ability of extreme rainfall conditions on highly rugged terrains, we use two analysis units to simulate soil erosion at the Shihmen reservoir watershed in northern Taiwan. The first one is the grid cell method, which divides the study area into 10 m by 10 m grid cells. The second one is the slope unit method, which divides the study area using natural breaks in landform. We compared the modeling results with field measurements of erosion pins. To our surprise, the grid cell method is much more accurate in predicting soil erosion than the slope unit method, although the slope unit method resembles the real terrains much better than the grid cell method. The average erosion pin measurement is 6.5 mm in the Shihmen reservoir watershed, which is equivalent to 90.6 t ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> of soil erosion.
