KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Maruyama, TakashiSubject: search.filters.subject.hmF2

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Ionospheric peak height at the magnetic equator: Comparison between ionosonde measurements and IRI
    (2017-07-15)
    Maruyama, Takashi
    ;
    Ma, Guanyi
    ;
    Tsugawa, Takuya
    ;
    Supnithi, Pornchai
    ;
    Komolmis, Tharadol
    The ionospheric peak height in the F layer (hmF2) varies with not only thermospheric conditions but also dynamic processes in the upper atmosphere. At mid-latitudes, the field-aligned diffusion and recombination loss determine the hmF2 in the absence of applied vertical drift. Vertical drifts displace the hmF2 to a new equilibrium position in conjunction with the field-aligned redistribution of the plasma. In the vicinity of the magnetic equator, however, the equilibrium state would be different from low and mid-latitudes because the direct vertical coupling of plasma through the diffusion process is not allowed. Thus the behavior of hmF2 cannot be simply an extrapolation of that at low latitudes. In this paper, ionosonde measurements of the hmF2 near the magnetic equator and off-equatorial latitudes are compared with the IRI output.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Ionospheric variation at Thailand equatorial latitude station: Comparison between observations and IRI-2001 model predictions
    (2010-01-15)
    Wichaipanich, Noraset
    ;
    Supnithi, Pornchai
    ;
    Ishii, Mamoru
    ;
    Maruyama, Takashi
    In this paper, the F2-layer critical frequency (foF2) and peak height (hmF2) measured by the FM/CW ionosonde at Thailand equatorial latitude station, namely Chumphon (10.72°N, 99.37°E, dip 3.22) are presented. The measurement data during low solar activity from January 2004 to December 2006 are analyzed based on the diurnal, seasonal variation. The results are then compared with IRI-2001 model predictions. Our study shows that: (1) In general, both the URSI and CCIR options of the IRI model give foF2 close to the measured ones, but the CCIR option produces a smaller range of deviation than the URSI option. The agreement during daytime is generally better than during nighttime. Overestimation mostly occurs in 2004 and 2006, while underestimation is during pre-sunrise hours in June solstice in 2005. The peak foF2 around sunset is higher during March equinox and September equinox than the other seasons, with longer duration of maximum levels in March equinox than September equinox. Large coefficients of variability foF2 occur during pre-sunrise hours. Meanwhile, the best agreement between the observed foF2 and the IRI model is obtained in June solstice. (2) In general, The IRI (CCIR) model predicts the observed hmF2 well during daytime in June solstice from 2004-2006, but it overestimates during March equinox, September equinox and December solstice. For nighttime, the model overestimates hmF2 values for all seasons especially during March equinox and September equinox. However, the model underestimates hmF2 values during September equinox and for some cases during June solstice and December solstice at pre-sunrise. The agreement between the IRI model and the hmF2(M3000 <inf>OBS</inf> ) is worst around noontime, post-sunset and pre-sunrise hours. All comparative studies give feedback for new improvements of CCIR and URSI IRI models. © 2009.