KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Nimsanong, PhethaiSubject: search.filters.subject.k-nearest neighbors

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Effect of noise signals on partial discharge classification models
    (2015-01-26)
    Pattanadech, Norasage
    ;
    Nimsanong, Phethai
    This document proposes the comparison of four statistical classification models for partial discharge (PD) classification as follows: k-nearest neighbors (KNN) model, probabilistic neural network (PNN) model, and other two statistical models using principal component analysis (PCA) for a data reduction approach combined with KNN and PNN models, so called, PCA-KNN model and PCA-PNN model. PD phenomena, corona at high voltage side in air (CHV), corona at low voltage side in air (CLV), surface discharge (SF), and internal discharge (IN) were simulated and measured in the shielding room. Electromagnetic wave due to PD phenomena was detected using a log-periodic antenna and recorded employing a spectrum analyzer. 80 experiments in total were performed for CHV, CLV, SF, and IN. The original independent variables for each classification model, skewness and kurtosis of each period of the captured signals, were calculated. Then, 60% of experimented data was used as a training data for the PD classification model. Another 40% experimented data was used to evaluate the performance of the designed PD classification models. Besides, noise signals were generated with computer program and trained into the PD classification model as well. The peak of noise signal was set up at 10%, 20% and 30% of the peak value of the PD signal. These noise signals were added with the PD signals to generate a mixed noise - PD signal. Then, the mixed noise - PD signals were used to evaluate the performance of the PD classification models. It was found that the designed KNN, PNN, PCA-KNN and PCA - PNN model can predict PD patterns without noise signal with the accuracy 100%. Noise signals with amplitude of 20% or more of peak value of PD signal have obviously influence the accuracy of PD pattern classification. The combination of PCA with KNN model can improve the ability of PD classification compared with KNN PD classification model. However, it seems that PCA provided negative effect when PCA was combined with PNN model and evaluated with the mixed-noise PD signals.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge classification model
    (2015-01-26)
    Pattanadech, Norasage
    ;
    Nimsanong, Phethai
    The aim of this paper is to describe the effect of training methods on the accuracy of PCA-KNN partial discharge (PD) classification model. This model used principal component analysis (PCA) combined with k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model, so called, PCA-KNN PD classification model for PD pattern classification. PD phenomena, corona at high voltage side in air (CHV), corona at low voltage side in air (CLV), surface discharge (SF), and internal discharge (IN) were experimented in the shielding room. Electromagnetic wave due to PD phenomena was detected using a log-periodic antenna and recorded employing a spectrum analyzer. 80 PD experiments in total were performed. The original independent variables for the classification model, skewness and kurtosis of each period of the captured signals, were calculated. To study the effect of training methods: two patterns for data training, odd/even and block training methods were investigated. In case of the block training method, the effect of training data number can be examined as well. Besides, noise signals were generated with the computer program and trained into the PD classification models. The peak of noise signal was set up at 30% of the peak value of the PD signal. These noise signals were added with the PD signals to generated a mixed noise - PD signal. Then, the mixed noise - PD signals were used to evaluate the performance of the PCA-KNN PD classification model. It was found that the block data training method provided the higher accuracy PD classification compared with the odd/event data training method. The block training method with 80% training data/20% testing data gave the highest accuracy (95% correction) for PD classification without noise signal. However, this training technique provided the lowest accuracy (56.25% correction) for PD classification with the mixed noise-PD signals.