KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Srisamoodkham, WorachaiSubject: search.filters.subject.IRI-2016 model

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Positioning Comparison Using GIM, Klobuchar, and IRI-2016 Models During the Geomagnetic Storm in 2021
    (2022-01-01)
    Srisamoodkham, Worachai
    ;
    Ansari, Kutubuddin
    ;
    Jamjareegulgarn, Punyawi
    This paper compares the positioning accuracy obtained from the GIM VTEC, the Klobuchar model, and the IRI-2016 model at Chiang Mai and DPT9 stations, Thailand, during an intense geomagnetic storm of 2021 (on May 12, 2021). The results show that the diurnal variation of the Klobuchar modeled VTECs show the same trend as that of the observed GIM VTECs with the same peaks and the maximum deviation of 22.5% at 05:00 UT. Meanwhile, the IRI2016-predicted VTECs show its peak at 07:00 UT and are not available obviously during 13:00–21:00 UT due to the impact of this intense geomagnetic storm. Most of the ionospheric delays obtained from the Klobuchar model underestimate those of the GIM VTEC, whereas they overestimate those of GIM VTEC during after midnight and pre-sunrise period. At both stations, the mean ionospheric range delays of the GIM VTEC are highest during daytime period while those of the IRI-2016 model are largest during nighttime period. The positioning errors at higher latitude (CHMA station) are larger than those at lower latitude (DPT9 station).
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    A New Method for Computing Ionogram-Based TEC Based on Digisonde data for Disaster Prevention
    (2020-03-01)
    Jamjareegulgarn, Punyawi
    ;
    Duangsuwan, Sarun
    ;
    Supnithi, Pornchai
    ;
    Srisamoodkham, Worachai
    This paper presents a new approach for calculating the ionogram-based total electron content so as to be applied alternatively for alarming and preventing the disasters, for example, earthquake, tsunami or other space objectives. The proposed ITEC is estimated using the analytical expression of NeQuick model, the autoscaled Digisonde data, and a new variable "m" of 1. The results are show that 1) the proposed B0 is close to the B0-obs of Digisonde compared to the B0-IRI and the B2bot of the NeQuick model, 2) the diurnal variation of B0-Pro is the same as that of B0-obs compared to those of B0-IRI and B2bot, 3) the proposed ITEC is also close to the ITEC of Digisonde and TEC-iri, excluding the observed GPS TEC, and 4) all of the studied TEC values behave similar diurnal variations. Since the proposed ITEC is based on the analytical functions, the improvement of TEC-B0-Pro can be conducted reliably in order to close to the GPS TEC possibly and apply it optionally to correct the positioning errors for GNSS and aviation systems.