KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
2 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Hybrid Multi-Model Fuzzy Ensemble Approach for Cardiovascular Diseases Detection(2023-01-01) ;Chugh, Manop ;Anantavrasilp, IsaraThiemjarus, SurapaTimely detection of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is crucial to reducing mortality rates. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models for CVD detection often suffer from low model performance and hence lower accuracy and practicality of early CVD detection. In this study, we propose a novel hybrid ensemble learning framework that combines multiple ML algorithms and a fuzzy expert system to improve CVD diagnosis and prediction accuracy. We evaluate our proposed method on two standard datasets, namely the UCI Cleveland and Framingham, and compare it with four popular ensemble algorithms, namely Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, and Adaptive Boosting. Our results demonstrate that the proposed ensemble learning framework achieves higher accuracies of 91.2% (UCI Cleveland) and 91.7% (Framingham), surpassing existing algorithms by 3.3% and 8.8%, respectively. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Analysis of optimal sensor positions for activity classification and application on a different data collection scenario(2017-04-05) ;Pannurat, Natthapon ;Thiemjarus, Surapa ;Nantajeewarawat, EkawitAnantavrasilp, IsaraThis paper focuses on optimal sensor positioning for monitoring activities of daily living and investigates different combinations of features and models on different sensor positions, i.e., the side of the waist, front of the waist, chest, thigh, head, upper arm, wrist, and ankle. Nineteen features are extracted, and the feature importance is measured by using the Relief-F feature selection algorithm. Eight classification algorithms are evaluated on a dataset collected from young subjects and a dataset collected from elderly subjects, with two different experimental settings. To deal with different sampling rates, signals with a high data rate are down-sampled and a transformation matrix is used for aligning signals to the same coordinate system. The thigh, chest, side of the waist, and front of the waist are the best four sensor positions for the first dataset (young subjects), with average accuracy values greater than 96%. The best model obtained from the first dataset for the side of the waist is validated on the second dataset (elderly subjects). The most appropriate number of features for each sensor position is reported. The results provide a reference for building activity recognition models for different sensor positions, as well as for data acquired from different hardware platforms and subject groups.
