KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Thailand low and equatorial F2-layer peak electron density and comparison with IRI-2007 model
    (2012-01-01)
    Wichaipanich, N.
    ;
    Supnithi, P.
    ;
    Tsugawa, T.
    ;
    Maruyama, T.
    Ionosonde measurements obtained at two Thailand ionospheric stations, namely Chumphon (10.72°N, 99.37°E, dip 3.0°N) and Chiang Mai (18.76°N, 98.93°E, dip 12.7°N) are used to examine the variation of the F<inf>2</inf>-layer peak electron density (N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf>) which is derived from the F<inf>2</inf>-layer critical frequency, f<inf>0</inf>F <inf>2</inf>. Measured data from September 2004 to August 2005 (a period of low solar activity) are analyzed based on the diurnal and seasonal variation and then compared with IRI-2007 model predictions. Our results show that, in general, the diurnal and seasonal variations of the N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> predicted by the IRI (URSI and CCIR options) model show a feature generally similar to the observed N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf>. Underestimation mostly occurs in all seasons except during the September equinox and the December solstice at Chumphon, and the September equinox and the March equinox at Chiang Mai, when they overestimate those measured. The best agreement between observation and prediction occurs during the pre-sunrise to post-sunrise hours. The best agreement of the %PD values of both the options occurs during the March equinox, while the agreement is the worst during the September equinox. The N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> values predicted by the CCIR option show a smaller range of deviation than the N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> values predicted by the URSI option. During post-sunset to morning hours (around 21:00-09:00 LT), the observed N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> at both stations are almost identical for the periods of low solar activity. However, during daytime, the observed N <inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> at Chumphon is lower than that at Chiang Mai. The difference between these two stations can be explained by the equatorial ionospheric anomaly (EIA). These results are important for future improvements of the IRI model for N<inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf> over Southeast Asia, especially for the areas covered by Chumphon and Chiang Mai stations. Copyright © The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS).
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Comparison of GPS TEC measurements with IRI TEC prediction at the equatorial latitude station, Chumphon, Thailand
    (2011-01-01)
    Kenpankho, P.
    ;
    Watthanasangmechai, K.
    ;
    Supnithi, P.
    ;
    Tsugawa, T.
    ;
    Maruyama, T.
    We have analyzed the total electron content (TEC) derived from dual-frequency GPS receivers (GPS TEC) at the Chumpon station, Thailand, during the period 2004-2006. The diurnal, monthly, and seasonal variation in the measured TEC is compared with the TEC derived from the IRI-2007 model as well as the TEC obtained from the International GNSS service (IGS). To date, TEC data at equatorial latitudes are limited. The Chumphon station (10.72 <sup>°</sup>N, 99.37<sup>°</sup>E) is located at the equatorial latitude and the dip latitude of 3<sup>°</sup>N. The TEC from the IRI-2007 model is based on the actual F<inf>2</inf> plasma frequency (f<inf>o</inf>F<inf>2</inf>) measurement. The results of our study show that the TEC derived from the IRI-2007 model agrees with the GPS TEC data mostly in the morning hours, but that it generally underestimates the GPS TEC. The maximum differences are about 15 TECU during the daytime and 5 TECU during the nighttime. The underestimation is more evident at daytime than at nighttime. The noon-bite out phenomena are clearly seen for the IRI-2007 TEC, but not on the IGS TEC and GPS TEC. The general underestimation of the IRI-2007 model can be explained from the exclusion of the plasmasphere, whereas the large difference during noon bite-outs is caused by the difference in the slab thickness in the ionosphere between the IRI-2007 model and the actual measurement. When compared with the TEC from the IGS model, the TEC measurements at Chumpon appear to be quite similar. Copyright © The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth.
  • Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    Item type:Publication,
    Variation of ionospheric slab thickness observations at Chumphon equatorial magnetic location
    (2011-01-01)
    Kenpankho, P.
    ;
    Supnithi, P.
    ;
    Tsugawa, T.
    ;
    Maruyama, T.
    This study presents the diurnal and seasonal variations of slab thickness at the equatorial magnetic latitudes in Thailand during 2004-2006, corresponding to the declining part of low solar activity. The GPS-derived total electron content (TEC) and the maximum electron density of the F-region (N <inf>m</inf>F<inf>2</inf>) are used to compute the slab thickness (&tau) at the Chumphon station (10.72<sup>°</sup>N, 99.37<sup>°</sup>E), located near the magnetic equator. The results show that large peaks of slab thickness exist during the pre-sunrise hours in all three seasons at Chumphon when compared with other latitudes. The maximum value of slab thickness occurs when the peak electron density in the F<inf>2</inf> region is at the lowest level. During daytime, the slab thickness ranges from 200 kilometers to 580 kilometers for all seasons. During nighttime, the maximum value of slab thickness is 1250 kilometers in the summer of 2004. Moreover, the diurnal variation shows two minima that appear around 0900 LT and 1900 LT, during the post-sunrise and sunset hours. The seasonal variations show that the average slab thickness daily value is greater during summer and winter than those during equinox. Our study finds that the slab thickness at Chumphon located near the equatorial latitude is much larger than those found at low, mid, and high latitudes. The difference in slab thickness between the equatorial latitude and other zones is explained by the lack of plasma flow from the plasmasphere to the F<inf>2</inf> region at the magnetic equator. Copyright © The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth.