KMITL

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1

Browse

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.CCIR

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    A comparative study of ionospheric profile parameters B0 and B1 over Chumphon with IRI-2012
    (2015-08-17)
    Jamjareegulgarn, Punyawi
    ;
    Supnithi, Pornchai
    ;
    Wichaipanich, Noraset
    ;
    Ishii, Mamoru
    ;
    Maruyama, Takashi
    Average diurnal variations of ionospheric profile parameters B0 and B1 in 2009 are studied over Chumphon province, Thailand, and compared those variations with IRI-2012 model. The thickness parameter (B0) and the shape parameter (B1) are two main parameters to compute and depict the F2-layer electron density profile. IRI-2012, the latest version of IRI model, offers three options to provide B0 and B1, i.e., Bil-2000, Gul-1987, ABT-2009. Those options have never been taken for studying and comparing with the ionospheric observation data from a FM/CW ionosonde, Chumphon. Moreover, the observed B0 and B1 from Thailand have never been analyzed nor used while establishing the new table of (B0, B1) values of the IRI model. Hence, B0 and B1 observation is necessary as a part of the global validation study of the IRI-2012 model. Our studies show that: (1) In general, the average diurnal variations of B0 for the observation and the IRI-2012 model show the same trends, except B0 of Gul-1987 during 20:00 - 02:00 LT. The observed B0 averages are equal to 166.13 km and 99.18 km in the daytime and nighttime, respectively. (2) The average diurnal variations of B1 for the observation and the IRI-2012 model show the same trends, except B1 of ABT-2009. Average diurnal variations of the observed B1 look like a sine wave where the peak and lowest values can be found around the midnight and the noontime, respectively. For the IRI-2012 model, B1 of Gul-1987 is the same value as B1 of Bil-2000. The observed B1 averages are equal to 1.98 and 2.51 in the daytime and nighttime, respectively. Our observed B0 and B1 results are similar to other studies in equatorial latitude and low latitude stations. Our comparative studies provide some details for improving B0 and B1 parameters of CCIR-based IRI model in the equatorial latitude region.
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Some of the metrics are blocked by your 
    consent settings
    Item type:Publication,
    Ionospheric variation at Thailand equatorial latitude station: Comparison between observations and IRI-2001 model predictions
    (2010-01-15)
    Wichaipanich, Noraset
    ;
    Supnithi, Pornchai
    ;
    Ishii, Mamoru
    ;
    Maruyama, Takashi
    In this paper, the F2-layer critical frequency (foF2) and peak height (hmF2) measured by the FM/CW ionosonde at Thailand equatorial latitude station, namely Chumphon (10.72°N, 99.37°E, dip 3.22) are presented. The measurement data during low solar activity from January 2004 to December 2006 are analyzed based on the diurnal, seasonal variation. The results are then compared with IRI-2001 model predictions. Our study shows that: (1) In general, both the URSI and CCIR options of the IRI model give foF2 close to the measured ones, but the CCIR option produces a smaller range of deviation than the URSI option. The agreement during daytime is generally better than during nighttime. Overestimation mostly occurs in 2004 and 2006, while underestimation is during pre-sunrise hours in June solstice in 2005. The peak foF2 around sunset is higher during March equinox and September equinox than the other seasons, with longer duration of maximum levels in March equinox than September equinox. Large coefficients of variability foF2 occur during pre-sunrise hours. Meanwhile, the best agreement between the observed foF2 and the IRI model is obtained in June solstice. (2) In general, The IRI (CCIR) model predicts the observed hmF2 well during daytime in June solstice from 2004-2006, but it overestimates during March equinox, September equinox and December solstice. For nighttime, the model overestimates hmF2 values for all seasons especially during March equinox and September equinox. However, the model underestimates hmF2 values during September equinox and for some cases during June solstice and December solstice at pre-sunrise. The agreement between the IRI model and the hmF2(M3000 <inf>OBS</inf> ) is worst around noontime, post-sunset and pre-sunrise hours. All comparative studies give feedback for new improvements of CCIR and URSI IRI models. © 2009.