KMITL
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/1
Browse
2 results
Search Results
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Enhancing Strength and Ductility of Rubberized Concrete Using Low-Cost Glass Jackets(2026-04-01) ;Saingam, Panumas ;Noman, Muhammad ;Chatveera, Burachat ;Sua-Iam, GritsadaMehmood, TahirThis study examines the compressive behavior and analytical modelling of natural and rubberized concretes (RuC) confined with low-cost glass chopped-strand mat (GCSM) jackets. A total of forty-two cylindrical specimens were tested under axial compression to assess the influence of rubber particle size, confinement configuration, and the number of GCSM layers. The RuC mixes were prepared by replacing 20% of fine aggregate by volume with crumb rubber of two size fractions: coarse (2.0 mm, retained on #10 sieve) and fine (0.425 mm, retained on #40 sieve). Both full- and strip-wrapping schemes were applied using two, four, and six layers of GCSM. The results demonstrated that GCSM jackets significantly enhanced the mechanical performance of both NAC and RuC specimens. Full wrapping provided the highest confinement efficiency, increasing compressive strength by up to 115% for NAC and 90% for RuC, while the ultimate axial strain increased by more than 1300% compared with unconfined specimens. Strip wrapping also improved performance, producing strength gains of 25–45% and strain increases of 250–500%. Analytical stress–strain models were developed through regression analysis, showing strong correlation with the experimental results (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.80–0.99). The proposed GCSM jacket system demonstrates high potential as a sustainable and economical alternative for strengthening and retrofitting rubberized concretes, offering improved ductility and energy absorption while supporting circular material utilization. It is noted that the confinement ratio, size of rubberized aggregates, and their percentage replacement of rubberized aggregates should be consistent with the values used in this work in order to use the proposed analytical expressions. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Monotonic and cyclic axial compressive responses of concrete specimens externally confined with different types of FRP composites: experimental and analytical investigations(2023-10-01) ;Rodsin, Kittipoom ;Hussain, QudeerParichatprecha, RattapoohmThe main objective of this study was to investigate the monotonic and cyclic axial stress versus strain response of the concrete confined with different types of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites such as cotton fiber rope reinforced polymer (CFRRP), glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composites and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Another objective was to investigate the applicability of existing ultimate strength models to predict the ultimate strength of concrete confined with CFRRP, GFRP and CFRP composites. For this, a total number of 28 concrete cylinders were cast, strengthened and tested under pure axial compression. The concrete cylinders were strengthened with two and four layers of FRPs. The experimental results indicate that all kinds of FRPs are very useful to alter the ultimate strength and strain of the confined concrete. The highest increase in ultimate strength was recorded for CFRP composite confined specimens and the highest increase in ultimate strain was observed for CFRRP composite confined specimens. Further, both ultimate strength and ultimate strains are found higher in the case of cyclic loads compared with the monotonic load. In general, the stress versus strain curves of cotton fiber rope and glass FRPs are found trilinear. Whereas, stress versus strain curves of CFRP confined specimens are observed to be bilinear. Existing ultimate strength models developed for CFRRP and CFRP composites are found well accurate to predict the ultimate strengths of CFRRP and CFRP confined concrete specimens tested in this study.
