Sooraksa, Pitikhate
Loading...
Preferred name
Sooraksa, Pitikhate
Alternative Name
Sooraksa, P.
Main Affiliation
Email
pitikhate.so@kmitl.ac.th
2 results
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Indoor Device-free Localization Using Received Signal Strength Indicator and Illuminance Sensor for Random-forest-based Fingerprint Technique(2021-01-01); Indoor device-free localization (IDFL) offers more flexibility than conventional indoor localization (device-based) systems, as the targets or objects need not be equipped with any device to be located. In the process of IDFL, the target is passive, enabling applications such as monitoring of elderly people, security systems to detect intruders, and indoor navigation. Despite having more flexibility than device-based systems, IDFL is still inferior in terms of localization performance. The most commonly used technique for IDFL is the fingerprint technique, which uses the uniqueness of spatial information to predict the target's location. The spatial information is a fingerprint database containing information on locations and their corresponding parameters. The most specific parameter for the fingerprint database is the received signal strength indicator (RSSI). RSSI can be obtained directly from many low-cost devices, i.e., Wi-Fi-based devices, without the need to install additional hardware. The fingerprint technique is a two-phase process: The database is constructed in the offline phase, and a matching process to compare the target's current parameter with those in the database is performed in the online phase. We propose fingerprint-technique-based IDFL using RSSI and illumination from an illuminance sensor as the additional parameters of the fingerprint database. Both parameters are recorded by considering two scenarios: An empty room and a person standing in the fingerprint grids. The constructed database is the person-filled room subtracted from the empty room database. We use random forest, one of the machine learning (ML) algorithms, as the pattern-matching algorithm. We evaluate its performance by comparison with two other ML algorithms: K-nearest neighbor (k-NN) and neural networks (NN). The results show that k-NN has better accuracy than the random forest for learning and testing in terms of the root mean square error (RMSE). On the other hand, the random forest has better accuracy than NN and better precision than either k-NN or NN for learning and testing in terms of the standard deviation (STD). The results show the possibility of improving the IDFL performance by adding more parameters to the fingerprint database and using an ML-based pattern-matching algorithm. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Fingerprint-based Indoor Localization via Deep Learning(2023-03-24); Deep learning (DL) application is proven helpful in a vast research field. One recent trend is to employ DL in radio frequency (RF)-based indoor localization. The fingerprint technique is the most used indoor localization technique known for its accuracy and performance. However, the fingerprint technique pays a high cost and effort in offline database construction, while its performance solely depends on the database density. Moreover, to apply deep learning, we also need a large dataset for it to learn efficiently. We propose to implement a DL-based fingerprint technique to tackle both problems of dataset scarcity and localization performance. We propose the DL's discriminative model, i.e., multilayer perceptron (MLP), for classification tasks. For the fingerprint database augmentation, we employed the generative model, i.e., Generative adversarial networks (GANs). We considered using a received signal strength indicator (RSSI) from a measurement campaign based on Wi-Fi devices for the database. The total area of interest is 25 m<sup>2</sup> inside the typical classroom environment, and we consider the 25 fingerprint locations as labels. We have a dataset of 1,250 rows x 8 columns (from 8 reference points). From the results, by using only 50% of actual data combined with the 125 synthetic data, we can improve the accuracy by more than 200% compared to only using 50% of actual data and show a 60% improvement in the loss. The combination of 100% actual data and 125 synthetic data gives the best accuracy and loss performance of 0.76 and 0.85, respectively. It gives an improvement of 144% in accuracy and 200% loss performance. By implementing deep learning for fingerprint techniques for data augmentation and classification, we can achieve good performance and reduce the workload of fingerprint database construction.