Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. KMITL
  3. Publication
  4. Mammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Mammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System

Author(s)
Intasam, Anongnat
Piyawattanametha, Nicholas
Promworn, Yuttachon
Jiranantanakorn, Titipon
Thawornwanchai, Soonthorn
Pichayakul, Pakpawee
Sriwanichwiphat, Sarawan
Thanasitthichai, Somchai
Khwayotha, Sirihattaya
Lertkowit, Methininat
Phakwapee, Nucharee
Juhong, Aniwat
Piyawattanametha, Wibool
Date Issued
January 1, 2026
Type
Article
DOI
10.3390/cancers18010070
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer persists as a leading cause of female mortality globally. Mammograms are a key screening tool for early detection, although many resource-limited hospitals lack access to skilled radiologists and advanced diagnostic tools. Deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems can assist radiologists by automating lesion detection and classification. This study investigates the performance of various You Only Look Once (YOLO) models and a Hybrid Convolutional-Transformer Architecture (YOLOv5, YOLOv8, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and Real-Time-DEtection Transformer (RT-DETR)) for detecting mammographic lesions on an affordable embedded system. Methods: We developed a custom web-based annotation tool to enhance mammogram labeling accuracy, using a dataset of 3169 patients from Thailand and expert annotations from three radiologists. Lesions were classified into six categories: Masses Benign (MB), Calcifications Benign (CB), Associated Features Benign (AFB), Masses Malignant (MM), Calcifications Malignant (CM), and Associated Features Malignant (AFM). Results: Our results show that the YOLOv11n model is the optimal choice for the NVIDIA Jetson Nano, achieving an accuracy of 0.86 and an inference speed of 6.16 ± 0.31 frames per second. A comparative analysis with a graphics processing unit (GPU)-powered system revealed that the Jetson Nano achieves comparable detection performance at a fraction of the cost. Conclusions: The current research landscape has not yet integrated advanced YOLO versions for embedded deployment in mammography. This method could facilitate screening in clinics without high-end workstations, demonstrating the feasibility of deploying CAD systems in low-resource environments and underscoring its potential for real-world clinical applications.
Citation
Cancers, 18(1), 2026
Subjects

artificial intelligen...

breast cancer diagnos...

CAD

computer-aided detect...

mammogram

object detection

YOLOv10

YOLOv11

YOLOv5

YOLOv8

Metrics
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback