A systematic review on cultural context, time orientation, and power distance in ICT-mediated collaborative learning in higher education

dc.contributor.authorZhai, Chunpeng
dc.contributor.authorWibowo, Santoso
dc.contributor.authorViriyavejakul, Chantana
dc.contributor.authorRahman, Shaikh Sadik
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-06T10:53:46Z
dc.date.available2026-08-06T10:53:46Z
dc.date.issued2026-01-01
dc.description.abstractInformation and communication technologies (ICTs) encompass the use of digital tools including computers, mobile devices, online platforms, and interactive software for enhancing communication, learning, and productivity. Most studies focus on participation, communication, and learning experience, leaving a critical gap in understanding how intercultural constructs shape digital engagement and learning outcomes in multicultural ICT-mediated contexts. Many digital learning environments continue to reflect Western-centric assumptions about monochronic time management, communication patterns, and learner autonomy, which can marginalize students from high-context or polychronic cultural backgrounds. This systematic review examines three underrepresented cultural dimensions: Hall’s high- and low-context communication styles, which explain differences in direct and indirect communication; polychronic–monochronic time orientations, which explain differences in flexible and linear approaches to time; and Hofstede’s concept of power distance, which explains differences in expectations about authority and participation in ICT-supported higher education. The review seeks to identify the broader patterns through which these cultural factors influence access to information, digital literacy, communication, collaboration, and learning behavior in multicultural digital environments. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 22 relevant articles were retrieved from ProQuest, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The findings indicate that these cultural dimensions shape how students participate in ICT-supported learning, with many digital environments implicitly favoring low-context communication, monochronic time management, and low-power-distance interaction norms. This may place additional organizational and cognitive demands on students from other cultural orientations, although current evidence remains limited regarding whether culturally responsive adaptations improve academic performance as distinct from participation and learning experience.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Research on Technology in Education, 2026
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/15391523.2026.2661643
dc.identifier.issn15391523
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-105038553329
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/17643
dc.sourceJournal of Research on Technology in Education
dc.subjecthigh-context and low-context communication
dc.subjectICTs
dc.subjectpolychronic and monochronic time orientation
dc.subjectpower distance
dc.subjectstudents
dc.titleA systematic review on cultural context, time orientation, and power distance in ICT-mediated collaborative learning in higher education
dc.typeReview

Files

Collections