A comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors
| dc.contributor.author | Autcha Araveeporn | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-21T05:53:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-06-01 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper compares a Least-Squared Random Coefficient Autoregressive (RCA) model with a Least-Squared RCA model based on Autocorrelated Errors (RCA-AR). We looked at only the first order models, denoted RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1). The efficiency of the Least-Squared method was checked by applying the models to Brownian motion and Wiener process, and the efficiency followed closely the asymptotic properties of a normal distribution. In a simulation study, we compared the performance of RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1) by using the Mean Square Errors (MSE) as a criterion. The RCA(1) exhibited good power estimation in both cases where the data is stationary and nonstationary. On the other hand, when data oscillates around its mean, RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better. For real world data, we applied the two models to the daily volume of the Thai gold price and found that RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better than RCA(1). | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.14419/ijasp.v1i3.1286 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/4020 | |
| dc.subject.classification | Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling | |
| dc.title | A comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors | |
| dc.type | Article |