A comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors

dc.contributor.authorAutcha Araveeporn
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-21T05:53:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-01
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares a Least-Squared Random Coefficient Autoregressive (RCA) model with a Least-Squared RCA model based on Autocorrelated Errors (RCA-AR). We looked at only the first order models, denoted RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1). The efficiency of the Least-Squared method was checked by applying the models to Brownian motion and Wiener process, and the efficiency followed closely the asymptotic properties of a normal distribution. In a simulation study, we compared the performance of RCA(1) and RCA(1)-AR(1) by using the Mean Square Errors (MSE) as a criterion. The RCA(1) exhibited good power estimation in both cases where the data is stationary and nonstationary. On the other hand, when data oscillates around its mean, RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better. For real world data, we applied the two models to the daily volume of the Thai gold price and found that RCA(1)-AR(1) performed better than RCA(1).
dc.identifier.doi10.14419/ijasp.v1i3.1286
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/4020
dc.subject.classificationFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
dc.titleA comparison of two least-squared random coefficient autoregressive models: with and without autocorrelated errors
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections