Outcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis vs Talar Body Prosthesis as Treatment of Collapsed Avascular Necrosis of the Talus: A 10- to 13-Year-Follow-up Retrospective Comparative Study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorThos Harnroongroj
dc.contributor.authorMarut Arunakul
dc.contributor.authorPissanu Reingrittha
dc.contributor.authorBavornrit Chuckpaiwong
dc.contributor.authorChayanin Angthong
dc.contributor.authorTheerawoot Tharmviboonsri
dc.contributor.authorPenpun Lertwattanachai
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-08T19:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2024-3-19
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Joint salvage surgeries such as tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and talar prosthesis are commonly used in the surgical treatment of collapsed avascular necrosis of the talus (AVNT). However, differences in outcomes of these 2 surgical treatments are still inconclusive. This study compared the 10- to 13-year outcomes and 10-year survivorship rates of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis and talar body prosthesis in the surgical treatment of collapsed AVNT. METHODS: value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: = .023. CONCLUSION: Talar body prosthesis implantation in selected eligible patients demonstrated statistically significantly better 10- to 13-year clinical outcomes and higher 10-year survivorship compared with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in the surgical treatment of collapsed AVNT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort comparative study.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10711007241231966
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/17022
dc.publisherFoot & Ankle International
dc.subjectFoot and Ankle Surgery
dc.subjectTendon Structure and Treatment
dc.subjectLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
dc.titleOutcomes of Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis vs Talar Body Prosthesis as Treatment of Collapsed Avascular Necrosis of the Talus: A 10- to 13-Year-Follow-up Retrospective Comparative Study
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections

All