Mammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System
| dc.contributor.author | Anongnat Intasam | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nicholas Piyawattanametha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yuttachon Promworn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Titipon Jiranantanakorn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Soonthorn Thawornwanchai | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pakpawee Pichayakul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sarawan Sriwanichwiphat | |
| dc.contributor.author | Somchai Thanasitthichai | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sirihattaya Khwayotha | |
| dc.contributor.author | Methininat Lertkowit | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nucharee Phakwapee | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aniwat Juhong | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wibool Piyawattanametha | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-08T19:25:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12-25 | |
| dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer persists as a leading cause of female mortality globally. Mammograms are a key screening tool for early detection, although many resource-limited hospitals lack access to skilled radiologists and advanced diagnostic tools. Deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems can assist radiologists by automating lesion detection and classification. This study investigates the performance of various You Only Look Once (YOLO) models and a Hybrid Convolutional-Transformer Architecture (YOLOv5, YOLOv8, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and Real-Time-DEtection Transformer (RT-DETR)) for detecting mammographic lesions on an affordable embedded system. METHODS: We developed a custom web-based annotation tool to enhance mammogram labeling accuracy, using a dataset of 3169 patients from Thailand and expert annotations from three radiologists. Lesions were classified into six categories: Masses Benign (MB), Calcifications Benign (CB), Associated Features Benign (AFB), Masses Malignant (MM), Calcifications Malignant (CM), and Associated Features Malignant (AFM). RESULTS: Our results show that the YOLOv11n model is the optimal choice for the NVIDIA Jetson Nano, achieving an accuracy of 0.86 and an inference speed of 6.16 ± 0.31 frames per second. A comparative analysis with a graphics processing unit (GPU)-powered system revealed that the Jetson Nano achieves comparable detection performance at a fraction of the cost. CONCLUSIONS: The current research landscape has not yet integrated advanced YOLO versions for embedded deployment in mammography. This method could facilitate screening in clinics without high-end workstations, demonstrating the feasibility of deploying CAD systems in low-resource environments and underscoring its potential for real-world clinical applications. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/cancers18010070 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/20349 | |
| dc.publisher | Cancers | |
| dc.subject | AI in cancer detection | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 diagnosis using AI | |
| dc.subject | Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging | |
| dc.title | Mammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System | |
| dc.type | Article |