Mammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System

dc.contributor.authorAnongnat Intasam
dc.contributor.authorNicholas Piyawattanametha
dc.contributor.authorYuttachon Promworn
dc.contributor.authorTitipon Jiranantanakorn
dc.contributor.authorSoonthorn Thawornwanchai
dc.contributor.authorPakpawee Pichayakul
dc.contributor.authorSarawan Sriwanichwiphat
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Thanasitthichai
dc.contributor.authorSirihattaya Khwayotha
dc.contributor.authorMethininat Lertkowit
dc.contributor.authorNucharee Phakwapee
dc.contributor.authorAniwat Juhong
dc.contributor.authorWibool Piyawattanametha
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-08T19:25:56Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-25
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer persists as a leading cause of female mortality globally. Mammograms are a key screening tool for early detection, although many resource-limited hospitals lack access to skilled radiologists and advanced diagnostic tools. Deep learning-based computer-aided detection (CAD) systems can assist radiologists by automating lesion detection and classification. This study investigates the performance of various You Only Look Once (YOLO) models and a Hybrid Convolutional-Transformer Architecture (YOLOv5, YOLOv8, YOLOv10, YOLOv11, and Real-Time-DEtection Transformer (RT-DETR)) for detecting mammographic lesions on an affordable embedded system. METHODS: We developed a custom web-based annotation tool to enhance mammogram labeling accuracy, using a dataset of 3169 patients from Thailand and expert annotations from three radiologists. Lesions were classified into six categories: Masses Benign (MB), Calcifications Benign (CB), Associated Features Benign (AFB), Masses Malignant (MM), Calcifications Malignant (CM), and Associated Features Malignant (AFM). RESULTS: Our results show that the YOLOv11n model is the optimal choice for the NVIDIA Jetson Nano, achieving an accuracy of 0.86 and an inference speed of 6.16 ± 0.31 frames per second. A comparative analysis with a graphics processing unit (GPU)-powered system revealed that the Jetson Nano achieves comparable detection performance at a fraction of the cost. CONCLUSIONS: The current research landscape has not yet integrated advanced YOLO versions for embedded deployment in mammography. This method could facilitate screening in clinics without high-end workstations, demonstrating the feasibility of deploying CAD systems in low-resource environments and underscoring its potential for real-world clinical applications.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/cancers18010070
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.kmitl.ac.th/handle/123456789/20349
dc.publisherCancers
dc.subjectAI in cancer detection
dc.subjectCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
dc.subjectDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging
dc.titleMammogram Analysis with YOLO Models on an Affordable Embedded System
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections