Permana, Ariva

Preferred name

Permana, Ariva

Alternative Name

Permana, Ariva Sugandi

Permana, Ariva S.

Main Affiliation

School of Engineering

ariva.pe@kmitl.ac.th

Now showing 1 - 6 of 6

Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Sustainability transitions: Comparing urban sophistication and rural simplicity
(2025-04-25)
Permana, Ariva Sugandi
;
Potipituk, Chantamon
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The trilemma of the water-pricing policy, the social function of water, and the threats to water security in a Metropolitan Region
(2023-06-01)
Permana, Ariva Sugandi
;
As’ad, Sholihin
;
Ikhsan, Cahyono
;
Morris, John
The water security issue is worsened by the presence of the global threat of climate change that may inhibit global and local water availability. This study explores water security from the perspective of three impelling factors and was carried out in Bangkok Metropolitan Region (BMR), Thailand. We define the trilemma as three generally conflicting factors that bring different consequences because of water security. The study was organized by accounting time-independent hydrological budget in the region comprises of surface water, probable atmospheric water, and groundwater against current and future water demands with particular water qualities for different purposes. A sensitivity analysis has also been done. The study found that with current water resources development and water demand, the BMR would unlikely encounter water security issues, given the existing trilemma as a constraint. However, with a continuous increase in water demand and unchanged supply, water scarcity would likely be faced by BMR, as analysis suggests.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
The Multipronged Approach of Solid Waste Management Toward Zero Waste to Landfill Site: An Indonesia and Thailand Experience
(2023-01-01)
Permana, Ariva Sugandi
;
As’ad, Sholihin
;
Potipituk, Chantamon
The zero-waste term in municipal solid waste management has been the utopian objective of every waste management authority in the cities in developing countries, even though it comes with different perceptions, which are sometimes misguided. People can produce no waste unless they live with no consumption. The zero-waste term does not mean that we produce no waste, rather we dump no waste at the landfill site. It means we dispose of nothing at a landfill site since the issue of landfill site can be a culprit of waste management, for its reiterating city land demands that generate “headaches” to city authority because of NIMBYism (Not In My Back Yard issue). No one accepts living voluntarily next to a landfill site as it creates more harm than harmless. With zero waste at the landfill site in mind, the waste management authority attempts to deal with the complexity of municipal solid waste management, by reviving each element of the waste management stakeholders to concertedly move on to deal with waste. Individual households and communities, without which waste management will not be successful, were positioned as the main thrust of waste management. A multipronged approach was implemented with all stakeholders, i.e., lawmakers, regulators, waste producers, implementers, and pressure groups, appearing with different functions but a common point: zero waste at the landfill site. A stakeholder with a large capacity, i.e., local government focuses on creating a large project that has a large impact on overall waste management; private sectors may contribute to establishing recycling centers, and waste-to-energy projects. Meanwhile, the individual households, which are large in number but have a small capacity, establish community-based activities, i.e., waste banks. This chapter attempts to provide the overall picture of municipal solid waste management in 14 cities in developing countries toward their goal of zero waste at landfill sites.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
USING THE ZOPA MODEL TO SYNERGIZE THE DIFFERENT INTERESTS OF LOCAL AND CENTRAL AUTHORITIES IN AN ADAPTIVE CITY PLAN TOWARDS FLOOD RESILIENCE IN SURAKARTA CITY, INDONESIA
(2020-01-01)
Miladan, Nur
;
Permana, Ariva Sugandi
Surakarta City, a secondary city in Indonesia, has been threatened by floods for many decades due to the overflow of rivers and an inadequate urban drainage system. On top of that, inelastic time-bound city planning has made the city susceptible to ever-increasing flood threats. The local authority has attempted to minimize flood risk through particular structural mitigations of the urban drainage system, which it has authority to do, while the overall responsibility for flood control and river management is under central authority. The different responsibilities of these two different levels of authority have led to gaps and overlaps in relation to the same objects of interest. On one hand, the city authority is concerned with city planning, and on the other hand, the flood control and river management authority is responsible for combatting flooding problems and river management within the watershed. This issue is an interesting point to investigate. In order for Surakarta to become a resilient city, it is imperative to synergize the efforts of these two different levels of authorities. This study aims to find the synergistic and optimal solutions by means of a negotiated planning and management system that involves both authorities. Critical evaluation and assessment of relevant documents, field observations, and measurements, as well as acquiring expert opinions were the main methods used in this study. We propose a ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement) model to optimize agreement among the stakeholders. The model essentially highlights the common interests and sets aside the conflicting points among stakeholders. The study found that there are potential points to negotiate with regard to the division of responsibilities through a shared vision of the coordinated institutions and shared planning and management in the direction of synergistic determination.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Armor Layer Uniformity and Thickness in Stationary Conditions with Steady Uniform Flow
(2022-06-01)
Ikhsan, Cahyono
;
Permana, Ariva S.
;
Negara, Arlendenovega S.
The continuous movement of riverbed particles due to turbulent flow determines the stability of non-cohesive riverbeds and banks during riverbed and bank erosion and sedimentation. This study emulated the stable channel design by deriving the low maintenance cost of the channel through bed protection by an armor layer. The study investigated the effects of shear stress and grain size uniformity to determine the minimum non-cohesive armor layer thickness for the stability of riverbeds under steady uniform flow conditions. Experiments were conducted with four different discharges, five armor material gradations, and five bed-slope variations in a full-scale flume. We observed and recorded the behaviors of the five gradations of armor materials for given discharges and bed slopes. Eighty data points were recorded and analyzed. The hydraulic analysis of the flow along with the soil mechanics analysis of the armor materials was done. The soil mechanic analysis was particularly focused on the uniformity coefficient of the armor layer, C<inf>u</inf>, to derive the armor layer equation. However, for the manageability of the study, we set the limit of the Cu between 3.0 and 6.0. From the viewpoint of non-erodibility, a wider C<inf>u</inf> value indicated a thinner armor layer. Variables that govern the armor layer thickness and the layer thickness itself were derived and proposed. The variables, namely C<inf>u</inf>, shear stress (t<inf>0</inf> and t<inf>c</inf>), and mean diameter of the bed load and armor materials (D<inf>b50</inf> and D<inf>a50</inf>). Our results show that these variables governed the thickness of the armor layer, and this is expected to contribute to the design of stable natural channels, which can minimize the cost of irrigation canal maintenance and development.
Some of the metrics are blocked by your
consent settings
Innovative engineering strategies leveraging natural resources for sustainable development
(2026-01-01)
Permana, Ariva Sugandi
;
Potipituk, Chantamon
This chapter explores the integral role of sustainable engineering in promoting sustainable development. The paper underscores the importance of using natural resources responsibly to mitigate environmental impact and enhance long-term resource availability. Key strategies for efficient resource utilization are highlighted, focusing on optimizing processes and implementing advanced technologies to reduce waste and increase energy efficiency. Sustainable engineering practices are examined, including life cycle assessment and eco-design, to evaluate and minimize the environmental impacts of engineering solutions. The study also delves into renewable energy technologies and the circular economy model, advocating for the recycling and reusing of materials to sustain natural resources. Innovative approaches such as biomimicry and green engineering are discussed, emphasizing how they can lead to sustainable product development. Through case studies and real-world examples, the paper illustrates successful implementations of these strategies, providing a roadmap for engineers and policymakers to contribute to a more sustainable future. Ultimately, the research demonstrates that sustainable engineering is crucial for achieving sustainable development goals and ensuring the judicious use of natural resources. The findings present a compelling argument for integrating sustainability into engineering practices to foster a more resilient and environmentally friendly global economy.

Permana, Ariva

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page