Klomwises, Yuwadee
Loading...
4 results
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
- Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Energy Consumption Prediction and Anomaly Detection for Boiler Feed Pump in Power Plant Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning(2025-04-01) ;Khamfoy, Polawut; Enhancing energy efficiency and operational reliability is crucial in power plant management, particularly for high-energy-consuming machines such as boiler feed water pumps (BFPs). These pumps play a vital role in the continuous generation of steam and electricity and must operate 24/7 to maintain power production stability. This study proposes the development of predictive models based on machine learning and deep learning techniques to accurately predict energy consumption and applies best models to detect anomalous behaviors in BFPs, enabling timely and preventive interventions. A dataset comprising 43,082 hourly records over five years, with 18 critical operational features, was analyzed using preprocessing and feature engineering techniques. Various predictive models were trained and evaluated, including Multiple Linear Regression, Regularized Regressions (Ridge, Lasso, ElasticNet), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Decision Tree, Ensemble Methods (Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost, LightGBM), and Deep Learning Architectures (DNN, RNN, GRU, LSTM). Among these models, SVR demonstrated the highest accuracy (MSE: 13.5573, R²: 0.9838), followed closely by LightGBM. Feature importance analysis revealed that boiler feed pump discharge pressure and bearing housing vibration levels were the most influential variables in energy consumption prediction. Anomaly detection using the Interquartile Range (IQR) method classified deviations into two warning levels, enabling proactive maintenance strategies. Additionally, a Graphical User Interface (GUI) web application was developed for real-time monitoring, integrating predictive models, anomaly detection, and an automated email alert system to assist operators in responding to abnormal energy consumption events promptly. These results highlight the potential of predictive analytics and real-time monitoring in optimizing power plant operations, providing a foundation for extending predictive capabilities to other critical energy-intensive systems. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Forecasting Models for Thailand's Electrical Appliances Export Values(2023-01-01) ;Banditvilai, SomsriThis research aimed to study forecasting models for Thailand's electrical appliances export values. Thailand's monthly electrical appliances export values were gathered from the Information Technology and Communication Center, Ministry of Commerce, from January 2006 to November 2022. The data from January 2006 to December 2021 were used to construct and select the forecasting models, and the remaining were used for measuring the model's accuracy. Since the electrical appliances export values showed trends and seasonal variation, the researcher selected the Holt-Winters method with various initial settings, the Box-Jenkins method, and Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks (LSTM) for constructing models. The forecasting models were chosen by minimum Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) as a criterion. Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) was employed to measure the accuracy of the forecasting model. The study revealed that the Box-Jenkins model gave the appropriate forecasting model for Thailand's electrical appliances export values and gained a MAPE of 8.0%. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, The estimated parameter of logistic regression model by Markov Chain Monte Carlo method with multicollinearity(2020-01-01); Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method has been a popular method for getting information about probability distribution for estimating posterior distribution by Gibbs sampling. So far, the standard methods such as maximum likelihood and logistic ridge regression methods have represented to compare with MCMC. The maximum likelihood method is the classical method to estimate the parameter on the logistic regression model by differential the loglikelihood function on the estimator. The logistic ridge regression depends on the choice of ridge parameter by using crossvalidation for computing estimator on penalty function. This paper provides maximum likelihood, logistic ridge regression, and MCMC to estimate parameter on logit function and transforms into a probability. The logistic regression model predicts the probability to observe a phenomenon. The prediction accuracy evaluates in terms of the percentage with correct predictions of a binary event. A simulation study conducts a binary response variable by using 2, 4, and 6 explanatory variables, which are generated from multivariate normal distribution on the positive and negative correlation coefficient or called multicollinearity problem. The criterion of these methods is to compare by a maximum of predictive accuracy. The outcomes find that MCMC satisfies all situations. - Some of the metrics are blocked by yourconsent settings
Item type:Publication, Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimation of the parameters of the modified power function distribution(2021-10-01) ;Sangpoom, SuttidaOne of the extended power function distributions is the modified power function distribution. It has a malleable probability distribution and may be used to represent bounded data on an interval (0,1). The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach was used in the literature to estimate the distribution's parameters. However, because of the current prevalence of bias for a small sample size, this type of estimator has been widely warned. Consequently, we emphasize the method for reducing biased of the maximum likelihood estimators (MLEs) from order φ(n<sup>−1</sup>) to φ(n<sup>−2</sup>). In addition, there are a bias-corrected approach (BCMLE) and a bootstrap approach (BOOT). Various scenarios in Monte Carlo simulations are proceeded to compare the effectiveness of estimators among MLEs, BCMLE, and BOOT methods. As a result, we found that the root mean square error of BCMLE is less than MLEs and BOOT. Similarly, when BCMLE MLEs and BOOT are applied to real datasets, the BSMLE has the smallest standard error.
