Repository logo
Communities & Collections
Research Outputs
Fundings & Projects
People
Statistics
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. KMITL
  3. Publication
  4. DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION WITH YOLOV4 FOR SIMILAR AND STRUCTURAL DEFORMED FISH
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION WITH YOLOV4 FOR SIMILAR AND STRUCTURAL DEFORMED FISH

Author(s)
Kuswantori, Ari
Suesut, Taweepol
Tangsrirat, Worapong
Nunak, Navaphattra
Date Issued
March 31, 2022
Type
Article
DOI
10.21303/2461-4262.2022.002345
Abstract
Food scarcity is an issue of concern due to the continued growth of the human population and the threat of global warming and climate change. Increasing food production is expected to meet the challenges of food needs that will continue to increase in the future. Automation is one of the solutions to increase food productivity, including in the aquaculture industry, where fish recognition is essential to support it. This paper presents fish recognition using YOLO version 4 (YOLOv4) on the «Fish-Pak» dataset, which contains six species of identical and structurally damaged fish, both of which are characteristics of fish processed in the aquaculture industry. Data augmentation was generated to meet the validation criteria and improve the data balance between classes. For fish images on a conveyor, flip, rotation, and translation augmentation techniques are appropriate. YOLOv4 was applied to the whole fish body and then combined with several techniques to determine the impact on the accuracy of the results. These techniques include landmarking, subclassing, adding scale data, adding head data, and class elimination. Performance for each model was evaluated with a confusion matrix, and analysis of the impact of the combination of these techniques was also reviewed. From the experimental test results, the accuracy of YOLOv4 for the whole fish body is only 43.01 %. The result rose to 72.65 % with the landmarking technique, then rose to 76.64 % with the subclassing technique, and finally rose to 77.42 % by adding scale data. The accuracy did not improve to 76.47 % by adding head data, and the accuracy rose to 98.75 % with the class elimination technique. The final result was excellent and acceptable.
Citation
Eureka Physics and Engineering, 2022(2), 154-165, 2022
Subjects

computer vision

cultured-fish recogni...

fish automation

fish classification

YOLO

Metrics
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your Institution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Accessibility settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback